No Straw Men

Please excuse the mess; this site is very much under construction…

No Straw Men header image 2

Privilege Tax Reform over Tax Relief

May 8th, 2007 · by Jonathan Rick

Published in the Politico, May 8, 2007.

Another Tax Day has come and gone, but the Internal Revenue Service remains essentially unmoved and unchanged. Accordingly, instead of continuing to advocate tax relief, the right should focus its efforts on tax reform.

The Cleanse the Code Coalition is an excellent example of how this works. As John Berthoud, president of the National Taxpayers Union, has explained, while members of the coalition disagree sharply on specifics (for instance, whether the code should be more or less progressive), they all agree that the current system should be scrapped in favor of something “simpler, fairer and more transparent.”

Without wading into the question of whether the current code is unfair,there are three strong reasons why such reform should supersede relief.

First, reform is more urgent. Compliance with the tax code’s ins and outs, especially if you’re self-employed, necessitates a significant expenditure of both time (which translates into lost productivity) and money (to pay an accountant to ascertain your particular loopholes).

Second, reform is less divisive, easier to identify with and thus easier to sell. By contrast, tax cuts are always controversial. There is no one whom the current code—at 67,204 pages and with 1,638 forms—does not frustrate. Columnist Deroy Murdock reminds us that USA Today recently picked four tax professionals to create returns for the imaginary Bailey family. The professionals generated four different amounts for taxes owed. In 1998, Money magazine asked 46 tax pros to file for another hypothetical household. These experts gave Money 46 different tax liability figures, varying from $34,240 to $68,912.

Finally, reform is more important. In the same way that conservatives now emphasize the importance of judicial appointments (since federal judges receive lifetime tenure), we should seek changes that are permanent rather than temporary, changes that are so institutional they can’t be repealed by the stroke of a pen from the next president.

Tags: Uncategorized

0 responses so far ↓

  • There are no comments yet...Kick things off by filling out the form below.

Leave a Comment